There are days where I can't believe people have issues with homosexuals. I know the reality, people do have issues but it is the logic behind it that I am referring to. So, I starting thinking it might have to do with words or how we use or define them.
Lets take a look at Webster and see what it gives us.
1: of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex.
Straight forward, simple and dry but right...or is it? Honestly, it is bare bones and base of something much greater. Being homosexual is more then a simple sexual desire to have sex with the same gender, it about wanting to have a romantic relationship with the same gender and perhaps maybe a family of just more then one person.
They want to have dates with the same gender, wonderful good times that connect hearts and take that love to give it to others, all to the same gender. How is that so wrong and debased? How is this any different to heterosexual who get the same treatment in Webster?
1: of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the opposite sex.
We know that heterosexual is more then just sex, they want the same things as homosexuals.
Now I am sure someone is going to go that there are homosexual sluts running around and my reply is shut the f*ck up, heterosexuals have them too and probably more of them. Have the time it just hormones/people growing up.
While I am at it, going about definitions, I hate the word 'straight' when someone is saying they are heterosexual. I think it is an @sshat move but most people don't realize it. I know it a slang term really and works better in conversation but have you ever thought why we use that word. Again, let me show you a definition.
g(1): exhibiting no deviation from what is established or accepted as usual, normal or proper.
Gay, lesbian, bisexual; all of it is proper, normal and usual. Some don't think it is, but the majority does or at least close to it does. Some would disagree, as some elements of homosexual-ism is illegal in places but it just an example of the more 'vocal' are the ones in the control but give it time. Soon the laws will change then peoples attitudes with them, television as declared it so. See USA, Fox (not Fox News) and Logo.
Post a Comment